Alameda County Opposes ICE Detention Center, Reuse of Dublin Prison, Amid Uncertainty Over Federal Plans
Supe draws backlash over internment comments, defense of detention facilities; Swalwell rebuts his campaign's latest scandal; Simon calls for Trump impeachment, Khanna wants to invoke 25th Amendment

☕️MORNING BUZZ
Vol. VI, No. 1,236
—Alameda County supervisors have approved a resolution urging that the former FCI Dublin not be reopened to house incarcerated individuals or repurposed as an ICE detention center, amid lingering fears in the Tri-Valley about its future use.
The federal prison was shuttered after widespread reports of sexual abuse by staff against incarcerated women, a scandal that drew national outrage.
In recent months, however, advocates and local officials have grown concerned the site could be targeted for immigration detention—particularly amid broader enforcement rhetoric associated with the Trump administration.
While federal officials have publicly stated there are no current plans for the facility, skepticism remains high among residents and local leaders.
Supervisor David Haubert, who brought the resolution forward with Supervisor Elisa Márquez, said of any potential plans for the former jail, “We don’t want this.”
However, he also called the resolution “somewhat symbolic,” noting “the federal government will do what the federal government will do.”
—At Tuesday afternoon’s meeting, a large number of public commenters spoke in unanimous support of the resolution, many condemning any potential plans tied to federal immigration enforcement and voicing strong opposition to the Trump administration’s policies.
Even with federal assurances that no plans are in place, speakers repeatedly expressed distrust and urged county leaders to take a clear and proactive position.
The Dublin City Council adopted a similar resolution in December, reflecting growing concern locally about the possibility—however uncertain—of a detention facility to Dublin, along with its impact on the psyche of its residents and economy,
Marquez emphasized the importance of taking a public stance. “It is important that we stand up,” she said, adding, “This is to let the federal administration know that we don’t want to see any prison or detention center in our community.”
Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bas framed the vote in historical terms, adding, “When we look back in history, we took action together. We stood up.”
—GET THE 411 ON THE 510—
Become an East Bay Insiders subscriber today and get FULL ACCESS to the inside scoop every weekday morning at 6 a.m.
IT’S WHAT THE INSIDERS READ.
—More inside:
🎙️AFTER HOURS: No-fault election chaos: Candidates forced to sue to fix mistakes they didn’t make.
COUNTY NEWS: Supervisor draws backlash over internment comments, defense of detention facilities.
Coliseum decision delayed again as supervisors postpone vote for second time.
D.C. NEWS: East Bay lawmakers erupt over Trump Iran threat, call for impeachment and 25th Amendment.
ELECTION 2026: Two new guv polls show some pre-Trump endorsement movement for GOP; Porter falls behind Swalwell, Steyer.
AG poll shows public has equal parts approval, dislike, and ambivalence toward Rob Bonta.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE: SEIU puts $2 million in new Swalwell IE; Form 497 large campaign contributions filed on April 7.
🎙️EAST BAY INSIDERS PODCAST
—EPISODE 128—Oakland Unified is at a crossroads—and the stakes couldn’t be higher. This week, Oakland school boardmember Mike Hutchinson joins the podcast for a blunt conversation about OUSD’s deepening budget crisis, and whether the district is inching toward another era of receivership.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to East Bay Insiders Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.



