Fremont Charter City Plan Heads to Council

Draft largely mirrors current system as costs, staffing increases, and potential tax measure raise concerns; CalFresh enrollment falls as eligibility changes and immigration fears deter applicants

☕️MORNING BUZZ

Vol. VI, No. 1,256

—Fremont’s charter advisory committee approved a draft proposal Monday night to send to the City Council, which will hold two public hearings this summer before deciding whether to place it on the November ballot.

The draft formalizes a council–city manager system, in which the City Council sets policy and a professionally appointed city manager carries it out.

The city manager oversees department heads, handles day-to-day operations, and is subject to council appointment and removal—largely mirroring Fremont’s current structure.

This model differs from a strong mayor system, where an elected mayor serves as the city’s chief executive, directly manages departments, and proposes budgets.

The proposal would also extend term limits for councilmembers and the mayor from two consecutive four-year terms to three.

—Placing the charter measure on the November ballot would be funded through the general fund, with estimated costs ranging from $610,000 to $855,000.

Some councilmembers pushed earlier this year to pursue charter status, citing frustration with being left out of administrative decisions while still absorbing public criticism.

Fremont Wants To Charter A New Course

However, City Attorney Rafael Alvarado said the draft charter largely mirrors Fremont’s existing general law structure, noting that many of the proposed changes could already be implemented through ordinance updates.

The city is also considering a separate half-cent sales tax measure for the fall ballot.

Committee member Rick Jones, who previously served as a Fremont councilmember, raised concerns about adding 1.5 full-time staff positions for the council and mayor—estimated at $250,000 annually—and the overall cost of the charter effort.

—Jones warned that pairing the charter measure with a tax increase could backfire, arguing both measures may struggle with voters amid repeated calls from councilmembers for fiscal restraint.

—GET THE 411 ON THE 510—

Become an East Bay Insiders subscriber today and get FULL ACCESS to the inside scoop every weekday morning at 6 a.m.

IT’S WHAT THE INSIDERS READ.

🗳️JOIN US! DEBATE DOUBLEHEADER ON MAY 2

🎟️Get Your Free Tickets Today!

—DEBATE DAY—Join us for an in-depth, high-stakes debate—not a candidate forum—spotlighting two of the most consequential races on the June 2 primary ballot:

🔵California’s 14th Congressional District (moderated by Alameda County Assessor Phong La)

🔵10th State Senate District (moderated by former Fremont Councilmember David Bonaccorsi)

• 📆Saturday, May 2, Noon to 2:30 p.m.

• 💦Sprinkler Fitters Local 483 Headquarters in Hayward.

---

⊕MORE INSIDE

• COUNTY NEWS: CalFresh rolls drop as fear, new federal rules weigh on enrollment.

• Thao/Duongs judge is overseeing high-profile tech trial in Oakland.

• ELECTION 2026: Labor backed Wahab, undercutting D.C. Dems push for CA14 placeholder candidate.

• CA14: Tri-Valley Democratic Club ‘no endorsement’ is problematic for two top-tier candidates.

• SD10: Top self-funding candidate writes another big check for his campaign.

• CAMPAIGN FINANCE: Campaign finance report snapshots and top donors for all Alameda County primary races; ballot measures in Oakland, Hayward.

• Form 497 large campaign contributions filed on April 27:

---

🎙️EAST BAY INSIDERS PODCAST

—EPISODE 131——EPISODE 131—On this week’s East Bay Insiders, we’re giving listeners a three-episode preview of After Hours—our subscriber-only, short-form, deep dive where the conversation gets a little looser and a lot more insidey.

---